SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 32

WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA
N. S. Sinha, J
Dr. Arabinda Roy – Appellant
Versus
Biswanath Debnath – Respondent


1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order dated 16.9.2014 passed by Ld. DCDRF, 24 - Parganas (North) at Barasat in CC / 369/2013 where the petition of complaint was allowed on contest against the OPs who was directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,00,000 (Rupees two lakh) to the complainant for loss of vision, mental harassment and agony and Rs.3,000 (Rupees three thousand) towards litigation cost to be paid within one month from the date of the order with further direction to pay a sum of Rs.100 per day from the date of the order till its realization as punitive damage to be deposited before the SCWF.

2. Being aggrieved by such judgment and order dated 16.9.2014 the OP / Dr. Arabinda Roy preferred this appeal.

3. The case of the complainant, the original respondent (and hereinafter referred to as the complainant) was that the complainant Biswanath Debnath filed an application before learned DCDRF, 24 - Parganas (North) seeking justice and reasonable compensation to the tune of Rs.10,00,000 (Rupees ten lakh) for the loss of his right eye sight. He, in his petition of complaint alleged that due to low vision in his right eye he consulted the visiting physician, Dr. Arabind











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top