Back
WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA
Shyamal Gupta (Presiding Member)
Swapan Kumar Sahoo v. Additional District Sub-Registrar Collectorate Compound
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. failure in service by developer affects consumer rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. ex parte hearing due to absence of the respondents. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. liability of public authority under consumer protection guidelines. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court ordered compensation. (Para 12) |
1. The short case of the complaint is that the Petitioner / Complainant approached to the developer for purchase one residential flat at Midnapore.
2. The valuation of the said Flat was assessed by the opposite party No. 1 Rs.27,21,600 only and accordingly the vendor presented the Sale Deed No. 5375 of 2014 dated 30.12.2014 before the ADSR, Opposite Party No. 1 for its execution and registration and the petitioners in accordance with the registration procedure had paid stamp duty of Rs.1,63,320 and also paid the required registration fees of Rs.19,176 on the date of execution of Deed on 30.12.2014 along with the said Deed of Sale in the office of ADSR, Paschim Medinipur.
3. That after received of sale deed, the petitioner went to the office of the LICHFL for deposit the same as mortgage in terms of loan agreement and after going through the said Deed the LICHFL and the petitioner found tha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
