Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ANIRUDDHA ROY, J
VEELINE HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
KHETAWAT PROPERTIES LIMITED – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendant's need for timely submission. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. discussion on defendant's obligation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. mandatory provisions under the cpc. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 4. court's decision on written statement. (Para 39 , 40) |
| 5. final ruling on application. (Para 41 , 42) |
1. The master summons and the supporting affidavit in IA NO.GA- COM/2/2025 has been taken out by the defendant with the following prayers :-
(a) Leave to file the written statement in the instant suit as the same is being filed within the statutory mandate of 120 days;
(b) Such further and/or other Order/(s) and/or Direction/(s) be given and/or made as to this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper;
2. Record shows that the master summons was taken out on August 19, 2025. For the purpose of adjudication of this application, the merits of the plaint case or the facts stated in the plaint are not relevant to be discussed, as such, those are not stated.
3. The writ of summons, as per the report of the office of the Deputy Sheriff dated November 26, 2025 was served upon the defendant on April 18, 2025. The mandated 30th day under the amended provision o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
