Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CHAITALI CHATTERJEE DAS
Hardama @ Subhrangshu Bera – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the basis for filing the fir. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdiction and maintainability. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis on fir credibility and legal standards. (Para 5 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. legal standards for quashing firs. (Para 7) |
| 5. decision to quash the fir and charge sheet. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
JUDGMENT :
CHAITALI CHATTERJEE DAS, J.
1. The application has been filed under Section 401 and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of the F.I.R no. 344 of 2021, pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Dantan West Midnapur. The complainant is an advocate of Calcutta High Court and he lodged the complaint on 23rd November, 2021 at around 3:20 PM. When he was leaving his chamber, he found one Palash Bera, Alias Bhola and the petitioner looking at the Opposite Party no. 2 ridiculed him and on asking Palash started abusing him with the filthy languages. The Opposite Party no.2, tried to take the petitioner and said Palash to his chamber for having a discussion, but Palash resisted and called his parents who came and started threatening the Opposite Party no.2 with dire consequences and instigated to kill the Oppos
The court quashed the FIR for lacking material evidence against the petitioner, emphasizing that criminal proceedings cannot continue without sufficient allegations.
Quashing petition under SC/ST Act dismissed as FIR allegations of caste abuse at public place prima facie disclose offences; courts accept averments at face value without evidence appreciation, civil....
Judicial proceedings that are manifestly absurd or founded on ulterior motives can be quashed to prevent misuse of the legal process.
The defense material must render the allegations redundant for the proceedings to be quashed, and a thorough trial is needed to establish the veracity of the allegations.
The court held that an FIR alleging cognizable offences cannot be quashed merely based on claims of disability or false implication; the truth of allegations is to be assessed at trial.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
