SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 4815

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SUPRIYA BARUAH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS – Respondent
WPA 2573 / 2025



##PAGE1##

23rd Dec., 2025 High Court at Calcutta

Item no.D/L 20

Court No. 02

In the

Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri

Pradip, A.R.(Ct.)

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Case No.

WPA 2573 of 2025

In the matter of:

Supriya Baruah

…. Petitioner

VS.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

….Respondents

For the Petitioner:

Mr. Jagriti Mishra

Ms. Ananya Bhattacharya

Ms. Mrinmoyee Das

….Advocates

For the State:

Mr. Hirak Barman

Mr. Pradip Sarkar

….Advocates

For the WBCSSC:

Mr. Kalyan Bandopadhyay, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Arka Kumar Nag

Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh

….Advocates

1. The petitioner participated in the 2nd SLST-2025 conducted

by the West Bengal Central School Service Commission in

respect of classes- ‘IX’, ‘X’ & ‘XI’, ‘XII’. She claims to be a

member of the scheduled tribe community. She paid the

application fees meant for the reserved category candidates i.e.

rupees two hundred. The authority treated her application in

the general category.

2. She is aggrieved by the same.

##PAGE2##

Page 2

3. The judgment passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench on

16th December, 2025 in MAT 2115 of 2025 in the matter of

The West Bengal Central School Service Commission & Ors.

Vs. Somnath Pramanik & Ors. has been placed before this

Court.

4. It appears therefrom that the Court directed the

Commission to open the portal for updating the categorization

of the candidates who filed writ petition in this regard upto

2.30 P.M on 16th December, 2025. The portal was directed to

remain open till 6.00 P.M. on 17th December, 2025.

5. The Court clarified that the direction was limited to persons

who approached the Court till 2.30 P.M. on 16th December,

2025 by way of filing a writ petition or appeal or otherwise.

6. The present writ petition was affirmed on 16th December,

2025 before the Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri and it was filed on

17th December, 2025.

7. It has been submitted that the order passed by the Hon’ble

Division Bench sitting in the principal seat was not known to

the party at the Circuit Bench. As the writ petition was

affirmed prior to delivering the judgment by the Hon’ble

Division Bench on 16th December, 2025, the prayer of the

petitioner for being treated as candidate of the reserved

category may be considered sympathetically by the

Commission.

8. In respect of the classes- ‘IX’, ‘X’, the petitioner updated

her caste category details in response to the window provided

by WBCSSC on 17th December, 2025 at 11.13 A.M.

##PAGE3##

Page 3

9. Learned senior counsel representing the Commission

submits that the Commission took steps in terms of the

direction passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench. The portal

was opened by the Commission for the period as stipulated by

the Hon’ble Division Bench.

10. Upon hearing the parties it appears that, admittedly, the

petitioner who is here at the Jalpaiguri Circuit Bench did not

have the opportunity to know the order passed in the Principal

Bench on 16th December, 2025. The writ petition was indeed

affirmed on 16th December, 2025 but filed on 17th December,

2025 before the Circuit Bench.

11. As regards the application of the petitioner for classes-

‘IX’, ‘X’, the petitioner claims to have already updated her

category details on 17th December, 2025 at 11.13 A.M.

12. The Commission is, accordingly, directed to take a decision

in respect of the caste category of the petitioner in connection

with her appearance in the examination for classes XI and XII

at the earliest keeping in mind the direction passed by the

Hon’ble Division Bench, especially in view of the fact that the

petitioner is not located within the principal seat of the High

Court at Calcutta.

13. The Commission shall also keep in mind that an examinee

ought not to be treated in two different categories in an

examination. The candidature of the petitioner shall be

ascertained from the caste certificate relied upon by her.

14. The writ petition stands disposed of.

##PAGE4##

Page 4

15. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for,

be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite

formalities.

(Amrita Sinha, J.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top