CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
PRIYANKA SAHA (NANDI) – Appellant
Versus
NARAYAN RAKSHIT AND ANR – Respondent
FMA 68 / 2024
##PAGE1##
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Circuit Bench At Jalpaiguri
The Hon’ble JusticPer eBsiesnwt:a roop Chowdhury
FMA 68 of 2024
Priyanka Saha
VERSUS
Narayan Rakshit & Anr.
For the appellant: Mr. Satyaki Basu, Adv.
Mr. Rumali Basu, Adv.
For the
respondent no.2
/Insurance
Company:
Mr. Rishin Chakraborty, Adv.
Last Heard on: December 18, 2025
Judgment on: December 22, 2025
Biswaroop Chowdhury, J:
The appellant before this Court was a claimant in a case under Section
166 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988, and is aggrieved by the Judgment and
Award dated 31-08-2019 passed by Learned Additional District Judge
Malbazar Jalpaiguri in MAC case No-323 of 2017.
The case of the appellant before the Learned Trial Court may be summed
up thus:
On 24-07-2016 at about 1.00 Hrs. when the said Soumendra Nath Saha
was returning to the Parental house of the appellant from Siliguri towards
Prakash Nagar on his motor cycle bearing Registration number WB-74-AJ-
##PAGE2##2
1741 at that time near Payal More, P.S. Bhaktinagar District Jalpaiguri a pick
up van bearing Regd. No. WB-72-C-0057 driven rash and negligently with high
speed dashed the said Soumendra Nath Saha returning to the parental house
of the appellant as a result Soumendra Nath Saha received severe injuries on
his person and was shifted to Anandaloke Hospital where the attending doctor
declared him dead.
Being unable to obtain any compensation in respect of the death of
Soumendra Nath Saha the petitioners being the wife has been compelled to file
this case praying for compensation of Rs. 42,00,000/- along with interest.
The Respondent no-2 Oriental Insurance Company filed written
statement and contested the case. ISSUES were framed and evidence was
adduced by the claimant/appellant.
Upon perusing the evidence adduced and upon hearing the parties
Learned Trial Court was pleased to dispose of the claim case by observing and
directing as follows
‘Hence it is ORDERED that the application U/S. 166 of the MV Act be
and the same is allowed ex-parte against the owner of the offending vehicle and
on contest against the O.P. no. 2/Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. without cost. The
claimant do get an award of Rs. 21,64,468/- (Rupees Twenty One Lakhs Sixty
four thousand four hundred and sixty eight only) along with simple interest @
9% p.a. from the date of institution of this case ie. 25.08.2017.
Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. is directed to pay a sum of Rs. 21,64,468/-
(Rupees Twenty One lakh Sixty Four thousand four hundred and sixty eight
only) along with simple interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of institution of this
case ie. 25-08-2017 by issuing one Account payee cheque in the name of
Priyanka Saha (Nandi) within one month from the date of this Judgment in
##PAGE3##3
default it shall carry simple interest @ 9% p.a. from date till its full realization.’
The claimant/Appellant being aggrieved by the Judgment and Award
dated 31-08-2019 has come up with the instant appeal. The ground on which
the Judgment is assailed is that the Learned Trial Judge failed to assess the
proper annual income of the victim/deceased and fixing fictitious reasonable
annual income. Secondly the Learned Trial Judge failed to appreciate that as
per last Income Tax Return of the deceased his gross annual income was Rs.
3,41,560/- (Rupees three Lakh Forty One Thousand Five Hundred Sixty). It is
also submitted that the correct multiplier is also not applied.
Heard learned Advocate for the appellant, and learned Advocate for the
respondent no-1. Perused the materials on record.
Learned Advocate for the appellant/claimant submits that the Learned
Trial Judge erred in not considering the income tax return document filed by
the claimant which was marked exhibit with objection. Learned Advocate for he
respondent no. 1 Insurance Company submits that the income tax return filed
by the claimant/appellant was Xerox copy thus the Learned Trial Judge rightly
refused to rely on the said documents.
Learned Advocate relies upon the following Judicial decisions:
Bony Dubey VS M/S. Shyam Bibi work’s and Another
Repo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.