SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 4951

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SURESH CH GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
DIPAK KR GHOSH AND ORS – Respondent
FMA 1569 / 2025



##PAGE1##

Form No.J(2)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Present : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

&

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

F MA No. 1569 of 2025

+

CAN 2 of 2025

+

CAN 3 of 2025

Suresh Chandra Ghosh

-vs-

Dipak Kumar Ghosh and others

For the respondent no. 1 : Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee, Snr. Adv.

Mr. Kushal Chatterjee,

Mr. Sibashis Chowdhury.

For the respondent no. 2 : Mr. Partha Pratim Roy,

Mr. Oishik Chatterjee.

Heard on : December 22, 2025.

Judgment on : December 22, 2025.

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.:

1. The affidavit-of-service filed in Court today be kept on record.

##PAGE2##

2

2. Despite service, none appears for the appellant at the time of

call.

3. Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1

submits that the appeal is not maintainable, since it has been

preferred against an order which was itself passed in a

miscellaneous appeal arising out of an order passed on an

application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the Code of Civil

Procedure (Code).

4. There is substance in such contention.

5. By a composite reading of the provisions of Order XLIII of the

Code, read with Section 104 thereof, it is found to be the clear

position of law that no further appeal lies from an order passed

in an appeal preferred under Order XLIII of the Code.

6. Since the present appeal itself arises out of an order passed in

an appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code, the appeal

itself is not maintainable.

7. Accordingly, FMA No. 1569 of 2025 is dismissed as not

maintainable without any order as to costs, consequentially

disposing of all the connected pending applications.

8. Interim orders, if any passed in the appeal, stand hereby

vacated.

##PAGE3##

3

9. Leave is granted to the appellant to prefer a properly

constituted challenge against the impugned order before the

appropriate court/Bench.

10. For such purpose, liberty is given to the learned Advocate-

on-record for the appellant to take back the certified copy of

the impugned order from the Memorandum of Appeal, from the

concerned department of this Court, upon furnishing a

photocopy thereof for the records.

I agree. (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)

(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top