CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
ROSHNI CHETTRI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS – Respondent
WPA 2515 / 2025
##PAGE1##
19-12-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Item No.27
Subrata Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri
Bhattacharyya
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
AR(C)
Appellate Side
WPA No.2515 of 2025
Roshni Chettri
-vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Shuvro Prakash Lahiri
Mr. Debajit Kundu …for the petitioner
Mr. Hirak Barman
Mr. Bikash Singha …for the State
Mr. Sunit Kumar Roy …for the Commission
1. The petitioner’s prayer seeking transfer stood
rejected on the grounds that she is a single
subject teacher.
2. The petitioner relies on the notification of the
School Education Department, Secondary
Branch, being No.09-SE dated January 3, 2022
published in the Kolkata Gazette Extraordinary
saying that in the event a single subject teacher
makes application for transfer, the school
managing committee will not reject the
application but will inform the District Inspector
of Schools (SE) about such application. The DI of
Schools is required to make local arrangement.
3. As per the notification dated January 3, 2022, the
DI of Schools was supposed to take urgent steps
in a time-bound manner to search for a teacher
on the same subject from nearby and make local
arrangement till a permanent teacher joins the
subject.
4. In the instant case, the DI of Schools sought for
##PAGE2##2
explanation from the head of the institution as to
how arrangement of teaching staff will be
managed by the school, if the petitioner is
permitted to be transferred.
5. It appears that the DI of Schools failed to act in
accordance with the notification dated January 3,
2022 mentioned hereinabove.
6. In support of the submission that the prayer of the
petitioner for transfer should be allowed, the
petitioner relies on the order dated November 3,
2025 passed by this Court in WPA No.21342 of
2025 (Amitava Pal –vs- The State of West Bengal
& Ors.) wherein the Court took note of the order
dated July 31, 2025 passed by the Hon’ble
Division Bench in FMA No.995 of 2022 with CAN
No.1 of 2025 (Rupak Dhua –vs- The State of West
Bengal & Ors.) wherein the Hon’ble Division
Bench was pleased to observe that the claim for
transfer cannot be kept in abeyance till a willing
teacher is found.
7. Relying on the direction passed by the Hon’ble
Division Bench in Rupak Dhua (supra), the
instant writ petition is disposed of by directing
the head of the institution to forward the
application of the petitioner to the DI of Schools,
Jalpaiguri once again for consideration in the
light of the notification dated January 3, 2022.
8. The application for transfer of the petitioner
cannot be left undecided irrespective of the fact
whether any alternative arrangement can be
made or not. The resultant vacancy on the
transfer of the petitioner shall be filled up in the
manner as directed by the Hon’ble Division Bench
in Rupak Dhua (supra).
##PAGE3##3
9. Steps shall be taken in the matter at the earliest,
but positively within a period of ninety days from
the date of communication of this order.
10. The writ petition is disposed of.
11. All parties are to act on the server copy of this
order duly downloaded from the official website of
this Court.
12. Certified copy of this order, if applied for, shall be
made available to the parties.
[Amrita Sinha, J
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.