CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SANTOSH GHIMIRAY – Appellant
Versus
SUSHMA CHHETRI – Respondent
16.12.2025 Sl.No.199 Court No. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side CRR 577 of 2025 In the matter of: Santosh Ghimiray ….. petitioner.
Mr. Jaydeep Kanta Bhowmik Mr. Debi Sarkar Ms. Jasmin Haque Ms. Moumita Shome Ms. Nipa Das … for the petitioner Mr. Aditi Sankar Chakraborty, Ld. APP Mr. Abhijit Sarkar ... for the State.
The petitioner is the opposite party before the Judicial Magistrate at Mirik District - Darjeeling in Misc. Case No. 01 of 2025.
The petitioner is aggrieved with an order of the court passed in the said case dated 3.12.2025 allowing the present opposite party (the petitioner therein) to amend the application filed by her under the P.W.D.V. Act.
Mr. Bhowmik, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has submitted on the basis of the copy of the petition filed by the present opposite party before the learned trial court under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, that the same filed by the present opposite party is erroneous and not maintainable, having not mentioned the schedule of amendment sought for by the present opposite party in the learned trial court. He submits that in absence of the schedule of amendmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.