SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 5231

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SANTOSH GHIMIRAY – Appellant
Versus
SUSHMA CHHETRI – Respondent


16.12.2025 Sl.No.199 Court No. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction Appellate Side CRR 577 of 2025 In the matter of: Santosh Ghimiray ….. petitioner.

Mr. Jaydeep Kanta Bhowmik Mr. Debi Sarkar Ms. Jasmin Haque Ms. Moumita Shome Ms. Nipa Das … for the petitioner Mr. Aditi Sankar Chakraborty, Ld. APP Mr. Abhijit Sarkar ... for the State.

The petitioner is the opposite party before the Judicial Magistrate at Mirik District - Darjeeling in Misc. Case No. 01 of 2025.

The petitioner is aggrieved with an order of the court passed in the said case dated 3.12.2025 allowing the present opposite party (the petitioner therein) to amend the application filed by her under the P.W.D.V. Act.

Mr. Bhowmik, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has submitted on the basis of the copy of the petition filed by the present opposite party before the learned trial court under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, that the same filed by the present opposite party is erroneous and not maintainable, having not mentioned the schedule of amendment sought for by the present opposite party in the learned trial court. He submits that in absence of the schedule of amendmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top