IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORIGINAL SIDE Commercial Division BEFORE:

The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR CP/1/2025 IA NO: CA/1/2025 SHYAM EMCO INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED AND BASANT KUMAR LOHIA AND ORS -VS-

THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES WEST BENGAL For the petitioners : Mr. Jayanta Kumar Mitra, Senior Advocate Mr. Rishav Dutt, Advocate Ms. Patrali Ganguly, Advocate Ms. Shrishti Roy Barman, Advocate Mr. Anuj Singh, Advocate For the Registrar of Companies : Mr. Ms. Shreya Choudhury, Advocate Ms. Rashmi Bothra, Advocate Mr. Jeet Barman, Advocate Heard on : 15.12.2025 Judgment on : 22.12.2025 Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.:

1. This is an application under section 463(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 challenging a notice dated December 12, 2024 bearing reference No. ROC/TS/Inquiry-206/21/116306/8941 issued by the Assistant Registrar of the Companies West Bengal, Ministry of Corporate Affairs (the impugned notice).

2. Briefly, the company namely, Shyam Emco Infrastructure Limited is engaged in construction activities. The petitioners are the present directors of the company. By a notice dated 31 March 2021, the respondent authorities had sought for information and explanations under section 206(1) of the Act. The company duly replied to the notice by a letter dated 16 August 2021 and provided a point wise reply. Subsequently, after a period of seventeen months, the company received a summons dated 21 March 2023 under section 207(3)(b) of the Act, directing the concerned officers of the company including the auditors to be examined on oath personally in relation to the letter dated 31 March 2021. Significantly, the company had timely filed all its financial statements and statutory filings for the relevant periods. Thereafter, the company received a communication dated 2 June 2023 issued under section 206(4) of the Act. By the said communication, the respondent authorities sought for queries and further information on the basis of financial information for the years 31.03.2020, 31.03.2021 and 31.03.2022 respectively and furnished necessary clarifications. Pursuant to the above, the respondent authorities on the ground of alleged violations under section 129(1) read with Schedule III Division II, 6E(I) i, (ii), (iii), (vii) of the Act, section 129(I), Schedule III, 6F (III)(c) of Division II and Schedule III Part I, Division II of the Act found the company to be in violation of the above provisions of the Act and threatened prosecution against the petitioners calling upon the company and directors of the company to file an application for compounding under the Act. In this background, the petitioners have filed this application seeking quashing of the impugned notice and all proceedings connected therewith.

3. On behalf of the petitioner, it is contended that the impugned notice is ex facie barred by limitation. All the financial statement and accounts were readily available with the respondent authorities. There is no case of fraud nor negligence of the directors or any other officer of the company. The company and its directors have all acted bonafide and in good faith. In support of such contentions, the petitioner relies on the decisions in Bhagwati Foods P. Ltd vs. Registrar of Companies, West Bengal (2008) 143 Comp Cas 531, Girdhar Tracom Private Limited vs. Registrar of Companies, 2024 SCC OnLine Cal 1671 and AI Champdany Industries Ltd. vs.

Registrar of Companies 2011 SCC Online Cal 2296.

4. On behalf of the respondent it was submitted that the clarification and queries sought for were in good faith and the petitioners always had the option of approaching the respondent authorities for filing applications for compounding of the offences complained of.

5. The relevant sections of the Act are set out below:

129. Financial statement.—(1) The financial statements shall give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company or companies, comply with the accounting standards notified under section133 and shall be in the form or forms as may be