SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 5603

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
CHHANDANA BHUIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
WPA 16708 / 2025



IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION (Appellate Side)

Present: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ W.P.A 16708 of 2025 Reserved on : 09.09.2025 Pronounced on: 16.09.2025 Chhandana Bhuin ...Petitioner -Vs-

State of West Bengal & Ors. ... Respondents Present:-

Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay Mr. Pronay Basak Ms. Aishwarya Datta Mr. Mahammed Reajul ...for the Petitioner Mr. Biswaroop Chowdhury Ms. Soma Chakraborty ... for the State Mr. Subir Sanyal Mr. Biswabrata Basu Mallick Mr. Ratul Biswas Mr. Aaman Arif Ansari ... for the DPSC, Hooghly Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J:

1. In the present writ petition, the petitioner, has approached this Hon’ble Court against the action of the respondent authority, namely the Chairperson of the Hooghly District Primary School Council being the respondent no.5 herein, challenging her transfer order and demotion from the post of Head Teacher to Assistant Primary Teacher.

2. The facts of the case in a nutshell are that the petitioner joined public service as an Assistant Primary Teacher of Sonipur Primary School under Hooghly District Primary School Council, pursuant to a Memorandum of appointment dated 28.04.1993 issued by the Chairman, Ad-hoc Committee. She duly joined the said school on 30.04.1993 and her service was formally approved by the competent authority. On 04.11.2004, the petitioner was appointed as the Head Teacher of Samantakhanda Primary School (KP-46) under Kamarpukur Circle, Hooghly. Since then, she has been discharging her duties sincerely and diligently, earning recognition in the form of three awards, two from the State Government (Nirmal Vidyalaya Puraskar and Sishu Mitra Puraskar) and one from the Central Government (Sachh Vidyalaya Puraskar).

3. Presently at the age of 59 years, the petitioner is suffering from serious ailments, including severe cardiac issues. She underwent Cardioversion treatment last year and is scheduled for Ablation treatment within months. Despite such conditions, she continued to serve in her post. The petitioner received a memo bearing no. 960/DPSC, Hooghly from the Chairperson of the Hooghly District Primary School Council (DPSC) dated 11.07.2025, calling her to a hearing on 15.07.2025 regarding allegations of physical punishment of a student. She asserts that the allegations are false, malicious and intended to malign her reputation. Rather, according to the petitioner, she herself had been assaulted by a student’s parent, in respect to which she lodged a complaint with the local police station. Mass petitions by her students also supported her innocence. At the said hearing, according to her, she was subjected to harassment, denied a copy of the complaint and not informed of the precise charges.

4. Subsequently, the Chairperson of Hooghly District Primary School Council issued an Order vide memo no. 1039/DPSC, Hooghly dated

21.07.2025 transferring her to Batanol Upendra S.N.S.N. Primary School, Arambagh East Circle, by stepping her down from the post of Head Teacher to Assistant Teacher, subject to clearance from the Chief Medical Officer of Health. This was followed the next day by a corrigendum order dated 22.07.2025. The petitioner highlights that such transfer was ordered just months before her superannuation in 2026, contrary to Rule 4 and Rule 5 of the West Bengal Primary Education (Transfer of Teachers including Head Teacher) Rules, 2002. She underscores that the statute vests transfer powers exclusively with the District Primary School Council and not its chairperson individually. In the instant case, with no functional Council in place, the unilateral transfer order was issued without jurisdiction. In these circumstances, the petitioner asserts that the impugned order is arbitrary and violative of the statutory provisions as well as her rights. Therefore, the present petition has been preferred.

5. The Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been compelled to approach this Hon’ble Court assai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top