SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 5608

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
NILADRI NANDAN HALDER – Appellant
Versus
ISWAR DADHI BAMAN SALAGRAM THAKUR JEW – Respondent


28.11.2025

428 Ct. no. 29 sb CO 3857 of 2024 Sri Niladri Nandan Halder Vs.

Sri Iswar Dadhi Baman Salagram Thakur Jew & Ors.

Mr. Anshuman Chakraborty Mr. Prasanta Bishal …for the O.P. nos.

2(i) & 2(iii)

Mr. Sounak Bhattacharya Mr. Sounak Mondal …for the O.P. no. 3 In spite of service of notice upon the learned counsel for the petitioner, petitioner is not represented.

This application has been preferred against the order dated 26.6.2023 by which the court below rejected the petitioner’s application under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Petitioner herein filed an application under Order VII rule 11 of the Code before the court below contending that the plaintiff has no cause of action to institute the instant suit since the defendants are only entitled to continue with the Seva Puja in respect of the private trust created by Bijay Krishna Bandyopadhyay and the Seva Puja is strictly confined to the member of the Bandyopadhyay family. No outsider or any villager can claim any right title or interest in the said private trust. However, the plaintiffs/opposite parties herein claimed that they are villagers and the property in question has become public debottar property and t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top