CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SANCHARI DE AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
PLABAN SEAL AND ORS – Respondent
04.08.2025 Sl No.19 Court No.16 (gc)
FAT 424 of 2024 CAN 1 of 2025 CAN 2 of 2025 Sanchari De & Anr.
Vs.
Plaban Seal & Ors.
Ms. Aiswarjya Gupta …for the Appellant.
Mr. Ujjal Ray, Mr. Ivan Roy, Mr. Abdur Rahim …for the opposite parties.
Re: CAN 1 of 2025
1. There is a delay of 172 days in preferring the appeal.
2. We are satisfied with the explanation offered for not being able to prefer the appeal within the period of limitation and hence the delay of 172 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.
3. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay is allowed and disposed of.
Re: FAT 424 of 2024 CAN 2 of 2025
4. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties on merits with regard to the propriety of the order impugned.
5. The misc. revocation case filed by one of the brothers-in-law who would have succeeded to the estate under Section 15(1)(b) of the Hindu Succession Act from the side of the deceased/testatrix, the learned Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Calcutta has allowed the said application for revocation on the ground of non-citation of the said heirs that was obligatory under Section 15(1)(b) of the Hindu Succession Act. The probate was granted on 19th March, 2018 and th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.