SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 5636

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SANCHARI DE AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
PLABAN SEAL AND ORS – Respondent


04.08.2025 Sl No.19 Court No.16 (gc)

FAT 424 of 2024 CAN 1 of 2025 CAN 2 of 2025 Sanchari De & Anr.

Vs.

Plaban Seal & Ors.

Ms. Aiswarjya Gupta …for the Appellant.

Mr. Ujjal Ray, Mr. Ivan Roy, Mr. Abdur Rahim …for the opposite parties.

Re: CAN 1 of 2025

1. There is a delay of 172 days in preferring the appeal.

2. We are satisfied with the explanation offered for not being able to prefer the appeal within the period of limitation and hence the delay of 172 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.

3. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay is allowed and disposed of.

Re: FAT 424 of 2024 CAN 2 of 2025

4. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties on merits with regard to the propriety of the order impugned.

5. The misc. revocation case filed by one of the brothers-in-law who would have succeeded to the estate under Section 15(1)(b) of the Hindu Succession Act from the side of the deceased/testatrix, the learned Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Calcutta has allowed the said application for revocation on the ground of non-citation of the said heirs that was obligatory under Section 15(1)(b) of the Hindu Succession Act. The probate was granted on 19th March, 2018 and th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top