M/L- 42

04/08/2025 Ct. No.-6 Aritra C.O. 292 of 2025 Vinty Khemani & Ors.

Vs.

Ghanshyam Das Harnathka & Ors.

Mr. Anjan Bhandari …for the petitioner Mr. Souradipta Banerjee Mr. Habib Hussain Ms. Fatima Hassan Ms. Shamrin Mr. Ranojoy Mullick ….for the opposite party Nos. 1 to 4 This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the plaintiff and is directed against an order being No.161 dated November 27, 2024 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 10^th Court at Alipore, District-South 24-

Parganas in Original Suit No.71 of 1997.

By the order impugned order, the application of the defendant No.1C for being appointed as the joint administrator pendente lite along with plaintiff No.1 stood allowed.

The learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the learned trial judge allowed the defendant No.1C to be appointed as the joint administrator pendente lite only on the ground that his predecessor-in-interest was appointed as a joint administrator pendente lite along with the plaintiff No.1 by virtue of an earlier order. He further submits that the learned trial judge proceeded on the basis that the subject matter of the probate suit are