SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 5792

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
APU SINHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
WPA 14022 / 2025



IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

Before:

The Hon’ble Justice Om Narayan Rai

WPA 14022 of 2025

Apu Sinha

-vs.-

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Barun Kumar Samanta, Adv.

For the State : Mr. Ansar Mondal, Ld. AGP

Mr. Tanweek J. Mandal, Adv.

Hearing Concluded on : 16.07.2025 Judgment on : 08.08.2025

Om Narayan Rai, J.:-

1. This writ petition assails an order dated April 21, 2025 passed by the Board

of the State Transport Authority, West Bengal.

2. The facts of the case as may be culled out from the material on record are as

follows:-

a) The petitioner owns a bus. It was thus far being plied on the route

Sonakania to Karunamoyee on the strength of an Inter-Regional

State Carriage Permit issued in his favour.

b) On or about April 22, 2024, the petitioner’s vehicle was

unauthorisedly halted by the petitioner’s own staff at CBT, Esplanade. Since the halt was in violation of the permit conditions, a fine of Rs. 10,000/- was imposed on the petitioner by a challan

dated April 22, 2024.

c) Subsequently, a Memo bearing No. 443/STA/SC dated July 3, 2024 was issued by the Secretary, State Transport Authority, West Bengal whereby the petitioner was directed to show-cause as to why should the petitioner’s permit not be cancelled for violation of the permit conditions.

d) The petitioner failed to give any suitable reply to the said show-

cause notice as the petitioner had allegedly not received the same within time. Consequently the Secretary, State Transport Authority, West Bengal issued an order dated August 6, 2024 whereby the petitioner’s permit was suspended for three months and the petitioner was directed to surrender the permit.

e) The petitioner represented against the said order dated August 06, 2024 by a letter dated September 02, 2024 and prayed for withdrawal of the said order of suspension but the State Transport Authority, West Bengal did not pay heed to the petitioner’s request. The petitioner, therefore, had to suffer the order of suspension of his permit for three months.

f) In the meantime, on August 12, 2024 the petitioner’s vehicle crossed Rabindra Setu, Howrah Bridge violating the permit conditions for the second time, wherefore another challan imposing fine of Rs.

10,000/- was issued against the petitioner.

g) Thereafter, the petitioner’s vehicle was found to have violated the permit conditions for a third time on September 09, 2024 and a further challan imposing another fine of Rs.10,000/- was issued against the petitioner.

h) Subsequently, the Secretary, State Transport Authority, West Bengal issued an order dated November 29, 2024 thereby cancelling the petitioner’s permit.

i) Upon receiving such order dated November 29, 2024 whereby the petitioner’s permit had been cancelled, the petitioner made a representation before the State Transport Authority, West Bengal on December 9, 2024 seeking withdrawal of the said order of cancellation of his permit. The said representation did not yield any positive result.

j) Being aggrieved thereby the petitioner approached this Court by filing a writ petition being WPA No. 624 of 2025. The said writ petition was disposed of by an order dated March 18, 2025 thereby directing the respondent no. 2 in the writ petition to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner after affording an opportunity of hearing to him. It was further directed that the said respondent would consider if the petitioner’s case could be “covered under the provision of Section 86(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act or not” and that if “upon consideration the said respondent came to an affirmative decision it would recall its order dated November 29, 2024 and pass necessary orders in terms of Section 86(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988”.

k) In terms of the said order, the petitioner was afforded an opportunity of being heard by the State Transport Authority, West Bengal and during the hearing an offer was made to the petitioner asking him to pay a sum of Rs. 4,00,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top