Aniruddha Roy, J. :

1. The pe titioner states that, arising out of a tender process a Work Order was issued dated September 26, 2018 in favour of the petitioner for carrying out certain civil construction work. The entire work has been completed by the petitioner to the satisfaction of the concerned municipality as would be evident from the Work Completion Certificates dated September 2, 2019, at page 24 to the writ petition and the last one is May 6, 2022, at page 39 to the writ petition. No objection or demur was raised as against the work done by the petitioner by the concerned municipality. The petitioner has raised his running bills and a part payment for a sum of Rs.22,48,000/- has been made to the petitioner in pro tanto satisfaction of the claim of the petitioner as would be evident from page 39 to the writ petition. The petitioner claims the balance amount of Rs.22,90,039/-

2. Learned Advocate Mr. Satarudriya Mukherjee appearing for the concerned municipality has drawn attention of this Court to the various requests dated March 2, 2020 at page 54 to the writ petition, August 22, 2023 at page 51 to the writ petition and the last one January 10, 2025 at page 49 to the writ pet