SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6245

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
NIJAM ALI MONDAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Debangsu Basak

CRR 1498 of 2025

Nijam Ali Mondal

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Anr.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dipanjan Chatterjee, Advocate

Mr. Kalyan Kumar Bhattacharjee, Advocate

Ms. Kakan Das, Advocate

Ms. Rimpa Adhikari, Advocate

For the Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. Dhananjay Banerjee, Advocate

Mr. Praloy Hazra, Advocate

Hearing & Judgment on : September 9, 2025

DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-

1. Revisional application is directed against the judgment and order dated

February 17, 2025 passed by the Court of the Additional Sessions

Judge, Kalna in Criminal Appeal No.07 of 2022.

2. By the impugned judgment and order, the first appeal court affirmed

the judgment and order under appeal. The first appeal court, however, noted that, the petitioner before us who was the appellant before the

first appeal court was not represented.

3. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the

petitioner was not heard prior to the appeal being disposed of. He

submits that, the first appeal court did not make any endeavour to engage any Advocate for the appellant for the purpose of disposal of the appeal.

4. Learned Advocate appea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top