OD-1

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

ORIGINAL SIDE

IA NO. GA/12/2025 WITH CS/245/1995

In

APD/120/2015

HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD.

Vs

SANTANU MULLICK, EXECUTOR & ORS.

BEFORE:

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA

AND

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA

Date: 26th November, 2025.

APPEARANCE:

Mr. Chanchal Kr. Dutta, Adv.

…for the applicant.

Mr. JishnuSaha, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Ishan Saha, Adv.

Mr. A. K. Awasthi, Adv.

Mr. Aishwarya Kr. Awasthi, Adv.

…for the respondents.

The Court: The present application has been filed seeking further six

months’ time to vacate the premises. The petitioner, being the judgment debtor, suffered a decree of eviction, which was affirmed in appeal by this court. While so affirming, on the prayer of the judgment debtor/petitioner, a

limited stay was granted till October 31, 2025.

Learned counsel for the petitioner now submits that the petitioner does not intend to prefer any appeal against the said judgment of the Appellate Court and wants to vacate the premises within six months.

Learned senior counsel appearing for the decree holders/opposite parties points out that already about three months’ time was granted to the judgment debtor to vacat