IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

W.P.A. 18583 of 2025

10.09.2025

Lipika Bose rkd Ct.18

DO -vs-

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Ekramul Bari, Mr. K. M. Hossain,

Mr. Sk. Imtiaj Uddin, Ms. Keya Sutradhar ….for the petitioner. Md. Ahsanuzzaman,

Mr. Pradyot Kumar Das

….for the State.

1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner

is taken on record.

2. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that

petitioner retired on superannuation on 28^th February, 2025 and till date has not received retiral

dues including pension.

3. Notice of this Court has been drawn to a document

at page 38 of the writ petition wherefrom it appears that Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance while settling retiral dues of the petitioner raised objection that petitioner was appointed on 3^rd October, 2000 as an approved teacher and sanction of yearly increment from 1^st October, 2005 in favour of the petitioner requires

review.

4. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that she

was an organizing teacher of a school who was granted approval vide memo dated 21^st November, 2006 with effect from 3^rd October, 2000. Therefore, petitioner did not have opportunity to get herself trained within the span of five years if it is reckoned from 3^rd October, 2000.

5. State respondents are represented by learned advocate who has opposed prayer of the petitioner and it is submitted that petitioner failed to obtain training qualification by 2^nd October, 2005. Therefore, till obtaining training qualification she was not entitled to receive yearly increments.

6. In reference to an order dated 6^th February, 2018 issued by the Joint Secretary to the Government of West Bengal, School Education Department it is submitted that exemption was granted to the teachers relating to obtaining training qualification but petitioner is not coming under the said order dated 6^th February, 2018. Therefore, it is contended that there is no discrepancy in the objection raised on behalf of the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance.

7. Petitioner was an organizing teacher who got approval of appointment in terms of the order of a coordinate Bench dated 20^th July, 2006 passed on a writ petition being WPO 615 of 2006 (Smt. Ila Saha & Ors. –vs- WBBSE & Ors.).

8. Pursuant to the order of the coordinate Bench dated 20^th July, 2006 District Inspector of Schools (SE), Nadia being respondent no.3 issued approval of memo on 21^st November, 2006 thereby granting approval of appointment in favour of the petitioner being organizing teacher with effect from 3^rd October, 2000.

9. After obtaining approval of appointment vide memo dated 21^st November, 2006 with effect from 3^rd October, 2000 petitioner obtained training qualification on 28^th June, 2010 which is within the period of five years from the date of issuance of approval memo dated 21^st November, 2006.

10. This Court finds substance in the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that she did not have opportunity to obtain training qualification within the prescribed period of five years if it is reckoned from 3^rd October, 2000 taking note of the fact that approval memo was issued on 21^st November, 2006 thereby granting approval of appointment in favour of the petitioner on and from 3^rd October, 2000.

11. Under the aforesaid special circumstances, petitioner was required to obtain training qualification within the period of five years from the date of issuance of approval memo on 21^st November, 2006 and in the present case petitioner obtained training qualification on 28^th June, 2010 which is well within the period of five years.

12. In view of aforesaid discussion, objection raised by the Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance that petitioner was not entitled to get yearly increment from 1^st October, 2005 is not tenable.

13. State respondents are directed to settle pension case of the petitioner taking into consideration yearly increments granted to her, within the pe