SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6453

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SURANJAN MANDAL ALIAS SURANJOY MANDAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

Appellate Side

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta

C.R.R. 239 of 2024

Suranjan Mondal @ Suranjoy Mandal

Versus

The State of West Bengal and Another

For the Petitioner : Mr. Amarendra Chakraborty, Adv.

Mr. Tonmoy Chatterjee, Adv.

For the State : Mr. Arindam Sen, Adv.

Mr. Sufi Kamal, Adv.

Heard on : 18.09.2025 Judgment on : 18.09.2025

Ajay Kumar Gupta, J:

1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respective parties. Earlier, CRR 239 of 2024 and CRR 240 of 2024

were tagged together for analogous hearing. But, during hearing, it appears both the cases are totally different and arose out from two different FIRs. Therefore, CRR 240 of 2024 has been de-tagged from CRR 239 of 2024 and heard separately.

2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner also filed written notes of arguments. The same is kept with the record.

3. The petitioner being an accused has preferred this revisional application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of criminal proceedings being G.R. Case No. 1467 of 2022 arising out of Itahar Police Station Case No. 325 of 2022 dated 30.05.2022 under Sectio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top