In The High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Judgment (2)

Moumita

Daily list Item No. 11

Court No. 2

Present :

The Hon’ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

WPA 18779 of 2025

Anil Singh

Vs.

The Union of India & Ors.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Shambhu Nath Roy

Ms. Munmun Das Ms. Afreen Parvez

Mr. Subham Rakshit

For the Respondents/Union of India: Mr. Siddhartha Bhattacharyya

Mr. Aritra Shankar Roy

Heard on : 22.09.2025 Judgment on : 22.09.2025

Aniruddha Roy, J.:

2. Mr. Siddhartha Bhattacharyya, learned counsel with Mr. Aritra Shankar 3. Mr. Shambhu Nath Roy, learned advocate, fairly submits that since the

decision for suspension of the petitioner taken by the employer concerned stands recalled/withdrawn/revoked and the petitioner is working, there is

no further question for challenging the decision of suspension by the petitioner. However, the petitioner questions the validity of the disciplinary proceeding.

4. Referring to the prayers made in the writ petition Mr. Siddhartha Bhattacharyya, learned Union Counsel submits that there is no challenge to the disciplinary proceeding in the prayers made in the writ petition.

5. After considering the rival contentions of the parties and on peru