SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6508

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
JUWEL SK. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


In the High Court At Calcutta

Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

CRR 3594 of 2025

Juwel Sk.

-Vs.-

The State of West Bengal

CORAM: The Hon’ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi

For the petitioner : Mr. Arindam Jana,

Mr. Sabbir Biswas,

For the State : Mr. Debasish Roy,

Mr. Saryati Datta, Ms. Eshita Dutta,

Heard On : 22.09.2025 Judgment On : 22.09.2025

Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.:-

1. The instant revisional application has been filed assailing an order dated

April 22, 2025, passed by the learned Addtional Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Murshidabad.

2. By the impugned order the learned ACJM, Murshidabad was pleased to

reject an application filed on behalf of the present petitioner for de-

freezing a bank account belonging to the petitioner.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the learned ACJM was not

justified in rejecting the application filed by the petitioner for de-freezing the account belonging to the petitioner. The learned Advocate for the

petitioner refers to the provisions under Section 102(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It is submitted that the seizure made by the Investigating Officer of the case was not reported to the Officer-in-Charge as required by Section 102(2) of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top