Form No. J(2)

Daily List Item No. 3

Court No. 2

b.r.

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Present:-

The Hon’ble Justice Aniruddha Roy

WPA 22254 of 2025

Sabir Hossain & Anr.

-vs-

The Union of India & Ors.

For the petitioners : Mr. Debasis Kundu

Mr. Bidhan Modak

For the Respondents

/Union of India. : Mr. Indrajeet Dasgupta

Mr. Tapan Bhanja

Heard On : 24.09.2025 Judgement on : 24.09.2025

Aniruddha Roy,J. :

1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today, is taken on

record.

2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking appointment for the post of Constable (GD) in the Central Armed Police Force under the Selection Process of 2025.

3. Referring to Annexure p-4 at pages- 27 and 30 to the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that at the Physical Standard Test (PST) level, the height of the petitioners have been measured as 169.5 cms. Referring to Clause 12.5 of the notice of the recruitment process, Annexure p-7 at page-41 to the writ petition and more specifically at page-42 to the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cut off qualifying height is fixed by the selection authority for male candidates 170 cms.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners draw attention of this Court to Clasuse-2(d) of the Medical Guidelines for Recruitment revised as on May 20, 2015. The relevant provision from the said Clause

2(d) is quoted below:-

“************************************************

************************************Similarly while measuring height Fraction of cm less than 0,5 will be ignored and 0.5 cm & more will rounded off to the next height cm Standard height weight chart is attached at annexure-1.”

5. Learned counsel further submits referring to the said Clause 2(d) from the said Medical Guideline that the said clause relates to measurement of Physical Standards. 6. In the light of the above, on behalf of the petitioners, it is submitted that since the height of the petitioners have been found to be 169.5 cms at page 27 and 30 to the writ petition, following the provisions laid down under the said Clause 2(d) of the said Medical Guidelines, the same should be rounded off to 170 cms.

7. In the event such rounded off measurement is taken in account, the petitioners automatically comes within the consideration zone for the next stage of the selection process.

8. In support, learned counsel for the petitioners have relied upon a decision of the Co-ordinate Bench dated September 12, 2025, inter alia, In the matter of:

Anuj Bala –vs- Union of India & Ors. rendered in WPA

21766 of 2025.

9. Mr. Indrajeet Dasgupta, learned counsel appearing for the Union of India/respondents submits that this rounding off 0.5 cm was not permitted by a Co-ordinate Bench dated November 29, 2024. In support, he has referred a decision of a Co-ordinate Bench, In the Matter of: Harun Miah –vs- Union of India & Ors. rendered in WPA 25903 of 2024.

10. After considering the rival contentions of the parties and upon perusal of the materials on record from a plain and harmonious reading of Clause 2(d) of the Medical Guideline, as quoted above, this Court is of the considered view that, while measuring the height fraction of centimeter less than 0.5 will be ignored and 0.5 cm and more will be rounded off to the next higher centimeter standard height-weight chart. In the instant case, admittedly height of the petitioners at the PST level was measured as 169.5 cms. Therefore, applying the provision of Clause 2(d) of the Medical Guideline, the same should be rounded off to the next higher centimeter standard height, which is 170 cms being the qualification prescribed under the Selection Rule.

11. The parties have also confirmed that no appeal has been preferred from the said decision of the Co-ordinate Bench, In the matter of: Anuj Bala (supra).

12. In the matter of: Harun Miah (supra) at the PST level the writ petitioner was measured as 169.4 cms, and as such his height was found to