SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6554

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
M/S MAHESK-E-PUNJAB RETREAT PVT LTD. – Appellant
Versus
ARYAN DHATU PVT. LTD. – Respondent


D/L.19.

September 24, 2025.

MNS.

CO No. 681 of 2024

M/s Mahesk-E-Punjab Retreat Pvt. Ltd.

Vs.

Aryan Dhatu Pvt. Ltd

Mr. Sounak Sengupta,

Mr. Amar Singh,

Mr. Rahul Deb Banerjee,

Ms. Sanchita Bera

… for the petitioner.

Mr. Aniruddha Chatterjee, Sr. Adv.,

Mr. Pankaj Agarwal,

Mr. Parikshit Lakhotia,

Mr. Soham Saha

…for the opposite party.

1. The present revisional application has

been preferred against an order whereby the learned Ttrial Judge dismissed an application for condonation of delay in filing an application for restoration of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short “the

1996 Act”).

2. The brief facts are that the Section 34

application was rejected by the concerned court on March 2, 2021. Thereafter, an application for restoration was filed only on

April 3, 2023, along with an application for condonation of delay in filing the same.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to place reliance on the different orders passed by the Supreme Court during the Covid-19 pandemic period, extending the limitation period for filing all applications during the said period.

4. It is submitted that during the said period, the brother of the deponent in the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top