SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6642

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SHANKAR GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
UTTAM GHOSH AND ORS – Respondent


D/L.12.

September 26, 2025.

MNS.

CO No. 1344 of 2024

Sri Shankar Ghosh

Vs.

Sri Uttam Ghosh and others

Mr. Sagnik Bhattacharya,

Md. Sahinurzaman … for the petitioner.

1. The present challenge has been preferred

by the preemptor in a proceeding under Section 8 of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955 (in short “the 1955

Act”).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that the preemption application was filed during the Covid-19 Pandemic period and, as such, was covered by the several orders passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, inter alia in the matters of MA 21 of 2022, MA 665 of 2021, Suo Motu Writ Petition (C) 3 of 2020, etc., whereby the Hon’ble Supreme Court extended the limitation period for filing applications and other legal proceedings. Thus, the

within the statutory limitation period.

3. The learned trial Judge, while considering the same, rejected the application on the ground that there is no provision in the 1955 Act regarding condonation of delay of limitation period in filing a preemption case.

4. The learned trial Judge further observed that the question as to whether the preemption application was time-barred can only be considered after trial as the right of preemption of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top