SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6710

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SHETGIRI AND ASSOCIATES – Appellant
Versus
BANK OF INDIA AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Original Side

Present :- Hon’ble Justice Amrita Sinha

WPO 730 of 2025

Shetgiri & Associates

Vs.

Bank of India & Anr.

For the writ petitioner :- Mr. Vibhakar Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Ajay Chaubey, Adv.

Mr. Vinayak Chaubey, Adv.

Ms. Ritika Pipalwa, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Utkarash Mishra, Adv. Ms. Ahona Majumder, Adv.

For the respondent :- Mr. Debashis Saha, Adv.

Mr. Avirup Roy Sanyal, Adv.

Ms. Sucheta Pal, Adv.

Heard on :- 28.10.2025 Judgment on :- 28.10.2025

Amrita Sinha, J.:-

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the cancellation of the tender process in

which it participated and emerged as the L-1 bidder. The cancellation was communicated to the petitioner by a communicating letter dated 22nd July, 2025. The letter of cancellation mentions that due to some technical reasons in the tender, the bank has decided to go for re- tendering for the same. Necessary information will be published in the

newspaper, Bank’s website and MSTC-E-tendering portal.

2. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the cancellation is mala fide, arbitrary and bad in law. According to the petitioner, the authority inspected the site in question and was satisfi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top