SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6772

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
BARJINDER SINGH KOHLI – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE STATE TAX DURGAPUR CHARGE AND ORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side Ct.551 03.11.25

M/l.

Item No.8 Sws.M

WPA 19676 of 2025

Barjinder Singh Kohli

Vs

The Assistant Commissioner of Revenue & Ors.

Mr. Sandip Choraria

Mr. Akash Chakraborty

Mr. Rishav Manna …for the petitioner

Mr. Tanoy Chakaborty

Mr. Saptak Sanyal

….for the State

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated May 15,

2025 passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the WBGST Act, 2017 read with

Section 107 of CGST Act, 2017.

2. The Appellate Authority has dismissed the

petitioner’s appeal on the ground of delay and non- compliance with the condition of statutory pre-

deposit.

3. The adjudication order passed under Section 74 of

the said 2017 Act is dated January 7, 2025 and therefore an appeal preferred thereagainst would have been within time, if the same had been filed within April 7, 2025. The petitioner, however, lodged the appeal before the appellate authority on April 26, 2025, that is beyond the period of three monthsspecified in Section 107(1) of the 2017 Act but within the condonable period of one month in

terms of Section 107(4) of the said Act of 2017. The petitioner while preferring such appeal did not put

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top