M/L.2.

November 3, 2025.

.

MNS

FMA No. 1398 of 2025

+

CAN 1 of 2025

Sri Gurudas Mallick and another

Vs.

Subhendu Sekhar Mallick and others

Mr. Tanmoy Mukherjee,

Mr. Rudranil Das

… for the defendants/appellants.

Mr. Kaushik Dey,

Mr. Debdipto Banerjee

…for the plaintiffs/respondent nos. 1 and 2

1. On the prayer of learned counsel for the

plaintiffs/respondent nos. 1 and 2, leave is granted to the said respondents to file their Vakalatnama by

November 6, 2025.

2. In view of arguable questions being involved in the

matter, we admit the appeal.

3. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, we

find that the issues involved in the interim application are same as those in the appeal itself and as such, instead of relegating the parties to a long-drawn hearing, we take up the appeal itself for

hearing.

4. The present challenge arises out of an order of

temporary injunction granted at the behest of the

plaintiffs/respondent nos. 1 and 2.

5. In view of the other respondents not being directly affected by the outcome of the present appeal, service of notice of appeal on the said respondents is dispensed with.

6. Since the plaintiffs/respondent nos. 1 and 2 are represented through counsel, we take up the appeal itself