SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6872

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
TAPAN JYOTI PAUL – Appellant
Versus
WEST BENGAL GRAMIN BANK AND ORS – Respondent


Form No. J(2)

Item No. ML / 91

adeb

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

(Appellate Side)

BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

W.P.A. NO 10589 of 2025

TAPAN JYOTI PAUL

VS.

WEST BENGAL GRAMIN BANK & OTHERS

For the Petitioner : Mr. Indranath Mitra For the respondent : Mr. Baidurya Ghosal

Nos. 1 to 5.

Heard On : 11.11.2025 Judgment On : 11.11.2025

SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.:

1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.

2. Petitioner was an employee of Bangiya Gramin Vikash Bank

(hereinafter referred to as ‘said Bank’) who suffered an order of removal from service. Petitioner preferred departmental appeal questioning order of removal passed by the disciplinary authority of the said Bank

but the order of disciplinary authority in appeal remained unaltered. Subsequently, petitioner made application for pension/compassionate allowance which was spurned by the Chief Manager (HR) and Trustee (BGVB Emp. Pension Fund Trust) being respondent no. 4 by letter dated 4th December, 2024. Said letter dated 4th December, 2024 is questioned in this writ petition.

3. Learned advocate representing the petitioner relies upon Regulation 29 of Bangiya Gr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top