CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
NURBANU BIBI – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER ALIPORE AND ORS. – Respondent
13.11.2025
Item No. 03
Crt.No.10
b.r. WPA 8869of 2024
Nurbanu Bibi
-vs-
Regional Transport Officer, Alipore & Ors.
Mr. Md. Shamim Uddin (VC)
Mr. Sk. Samiul Haque
Mr. Rannak Shaw
…. For the petitioner.
Mr. Pantu Deb Roy, Ld. AGp
Mr. Pannalal Bandyopadhyay
…. For the State.
Petitioner is represented through virtual mode.
The State-respondents are represented physically. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the
petitioner is taken on record.
The petitioner submits that the purchase of the
vehicle in question was purchased by taking a loan to the tune of Rs.36,1322/- from a Financial Authority, namely, Tata Motors Finance Limited-respondent no.3. The petitioner submits that on 8.3.2023 the representative of the respondent no.3 seized the subject vehicle from the petitioner on the ground of certain defalcation of loan amount and accordingly
issued a seizure list to the petitioner.
Petitioner files this writ petition for the following
reliefs, which is quoted below:-
“a) A writ of and/or in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to take
appropriate requirement of law and and/to declare the transfer of ownership as bad-in-law;
b) A writ of and/or in the nature of Mandamus commanding
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.