SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6909

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
NURBANU BIBI – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER ALIPORE AND ORS. – Respondent


13.11.2025

Item No. 03

Crt.No.10

b.r. WPA 8869of 2024

Nurbanu Bibi

-vs-

Regional Transport Officer, Alipore & Ors.

Mr. Md. Shamim Uddin (VC)

Mr. Sk. Samiul Haque

Mr. Rannak Shaw

…. For the petitioner.

Mr. Pantu Deb Roy, Ld. AGp

Mr. Pannalal Bandyopadhyay

…. For the State.

Petitioner is represented through virtual mode.

The State-respondents are represented physically. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the

petitioner is taken on record.

The petitioner submits that the purchase of the

vehicle in question was purchased by taking a loan to the tune of Rs.36,1322/- from a Financial Authority, namely, Tata Motors Finance Limited-respondent no.3. The petitioner submits that on 8.3.2023 the representative of the respondent no.3 seized the subject vehicle from the petitioner on the ground of certain defalcation of loan amount and accordingly

issued a seizure list to the petitioner.

Petitioner files this writ petition for the following

reliefs, which is quoted below:-

“a) A writ of and/or in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to take

appropriate requirement of law and and/to declare the transfer of ownership as bad-in-law;

b) A writ of and/or in the nature of Mandamus commanding

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top