Form No. J.(2)

Item No. ML/396

ARPAN - AR (CT)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

(Appellate Side)

CPAN 2047 OF 2015

IN

W.P.A. NO.19558 OF 2010

SRI DEBABRATA MAITI

Vs.

SRI UMESH CHANDA, CHAIRMAN, BANGIYO

GRAMIN BIKASH BANK, MURSHIDABAD & ANOTHER

BEFORE: THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

For the Applicant : Mr. Chittapriya Ghosh, Adv.

Mr. Asit Baran Ghosh, Adv.

For the Alleged Contemnors : Mr. Ajit Kumar Mitra, Adv.

Ms. Dipti Gupta, Adv.

Hearing concluded on : 14.11.2025 Judgment On : 14.11.2025

SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.:

1. Matter is heard in presence of the learned advocates representing the

applicant and alleged contemnors.

2. Question is whether judgment and order dated 17^th June, 2015 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench on the connected writ petition is complied with or not. For better understanding of the issue, this Court finds it fit to quote the relevant part of the judgment and order dated 17^th June, 2015 below:

“In those circumstances, it is quite plain that the writ petitioner has been treated unfairly and unjustly. This writ application has to succeed. The decision dated 12^th August, 2010 is set aside. Since the records of the recruitment process are not availabl