SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6943

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
MADANLAL AGARWAL @ MADANLAL GUPTA AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
AJAY KUMAR BHATTACHARYA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Debangsu Basak

CO 176 of 2025

Sri Madanlal Agarwal @ Madanlal Gupta & Ors.

Vs.

Sri Ajay Kumar Bhattacharya

For the Petitioners :Mr. Bapi Sarkar, Advocate

Mr. Roumyadip Saha, Advocate

Heard & Judgment on : November 17, 2025

DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-

1. None appears for the opposite party despite service. 2. Affidavit of service filed in Court be taken on record.

3. Revisional application is directed against Order No.49 dated August 26,

2025.

4. Revisional application is at the behest of the judgment debtors.

5. By the impugned order, an application of the judgment debtors, in effect,

under Order 21 Rule 29 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was dismissed by the Executing Court, upon returning a finding it was stated

to be under Order 21 Rule 26 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

6. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that, the petitioners complied with the order dated September 11, 2025 passed by the Executing Court and deposited the amount directed.

7. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that, the learned Executing Court acted with mat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top