CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
RIAJUDDIN MALLIK – Appellant
Versus
PRANAB MAHATA AND ORS – Respondent
AD-04
Ct No.16
17.11.2025
TN
SA 63 of 2024
IA No: CAN 2 of 2023
Riajuddin Mallik
Vs.
Sri Pranab Mahata and others
Ms. Usha Maity, Ms. Anita Khatri, Mr. Sakya Maity
…..for the appellant
Mr. Sukanta Das
….for the respondent nos. 9(a) to
9(f)/caveators
1. The present second appeal has been filed against a
judgment and decree whereby the first appellate court reversed the dismissal of a partition suit by the trial court and passed a preliminary decree therein. The
said suit was filed by the plaintiffs/respondents.
2. The learned Trial Judge dismissed the suit on several
grounds, primarily in view of the suit being barred by the principle of res judicata, since in a previous partition suit in respect of the self-same property, the present appellant had obtained a final decree which
allegedly had been executed in the year 2000.
3. Secondly, the learned Trial Judge proceeded on the
premise that the current suit was barred by Order XXI Rule 99 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in view of the plaintiffs/respondents herein having not raised the
question of their title and sought partition in the execution proceedings of the earlier suit.
4. Thirdly, the suit was dismissed on the ground that the same was barred by l
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.