SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6959

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
IMMAM SK. AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent


Form No. J(2)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Present: The Hon‟be Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

And

The Hon‟ble Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

W.P.L.R.T. 183 of 2025 Immam Sk. and others

Vs.

The State of West Bengal and others

For the petitioners : Mr. Ambu Bindu Chakraborty

Ms. Mrinmoyee Roy Chowdhury

For the State : Mr. Lalit Mohan Mahata

Mr. Rudranil De

For the Private respondent

nos.4 & 5 : Mr. Agniswar Chowdhury

Mr. P. Hazra

Heard on : 17.11.2025 Judgment on : 17.11.2025

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.:-

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the learned

Tribunal committed a patent perversity in proceeding on the

premise that a suit filed by the present petitioners seeking declaration of title and injunction over the self-same land which is the subject-matter before the Tribunal had been dismissed after full trial and the prayer for injunction made therein was rejected.

2. On such premise, the learned Tribunal held that the petitioners, having failed before the Civil Court, cannot re-litigate on the same issue before the Tribunal under the guise of a mutation dispute and the doctrine of finality of litigation squarely applies.

3. From the re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top