SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6977

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
PINTOO AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
AMAR NAULAKHA – Respondent


In the High Court At Calcutta

CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

APPELLATE SIDE

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Debangsu Basak

CO/171/2025

PINTOO AGARWAL

VS

AMAR NAULAKHA

For the Petitioner :Mr. Hasang Bhutia, Advocate

For the Opposite Party :Mr. Raja Saha, Advocate

Mr. Sujit Sankar Koley, Advocate

Ms. Bedashruti Bose, Advocate Mr. Subham Chanda, Advocate

Heard & Judgment on: November 19, 2025

Debangsu Basak, J.

1. Revisional application is directed against Order No. 27 dated July

31, 2025 passed in OC Eviction Suit No. 05 of 2023 pending in the

Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Darjeeling.

2. Revisonal application is at the behest of the plaintiff in a suit for

eviction.

3. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the

plaintiff filed the suit for eviction on October 16, 2023. The summons on the Opposite Party was served on November 1, 2023. The Opposite Party appeared on November 2, 2023. According to

him, therefore, in terms of Section 7(1) of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1997, since, the suit property was governed by the provisions of the Act of 1997, was obliged to deposit rent within one month from the service of summons on the tenan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top