SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 6978

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
KALYANI DAS – Appellant
Versus
BAJAJ ALLIANZ INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS – Respondent


In the High Court At Calcutta

CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

APPELLATE SIDE

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Debangsu Basak

CO/172/2025

SMT. KALYANI DAS

VS

BAJAJ ALLIANZ INSURANCE

COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS.

IA NO: CAN/1/2025

For the Petitioner : Mr. Pritam Roy, Advocate

Ms. Monisha Roy,

Ms. Silpi Basu, Advocate

For the Opposite Party No. 1 & 2 :Mr. Hirak Barman, Advocate

For the Opposite Party No. 3 : Mr. Tapas Paul, Advocate

Heard & Judgment on: November 19, 2025

Debangsu Basak, J.

1. CAN 1 of 2025 is an application for condonation of delay. For the

ends of justice, the causes shown in the application for condonation of delay are accepted as sufficient. Delay in making and filing the

revisional application is condoned. CAN 1 of 2025 is allowed.

2. Petitioner assails order dated January 13, 2025 passed by the

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in First Appeal

No. 1012 of 2024.

3. By the impugned order, the learned Tribunal, refused to allow an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 on the ground that, appropriate and adequate reasons were not canvassed for condonation of delay.

4. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, delay in filing t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top