IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma

CO 1820 of 2023 Tarun Paramanik

Vs.

Jharna Paramanik & Ors.

For the petitioners: Mr. Jayanta Kr. Mondal, Adv.,

Mr. Sayantan Rakshit, Adv.

For the opposite party no. 1 & 2: Mr. Tapas Dey, Adv.,

Mr. Prasenjit Saha, Adv.

For the respondent no.3: Ms. Sucharita Paul, Adv.

Reserved on: 29.10.2025 Judgment on: 19.11.2025

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.:

1. Briefly, stated the facts are that Late Jamuna Pramanik and opposite party

no. 1 and 2 Smt. Jharna Pramanik and Satarupa Pramanik filed a claim case no. being MAC 61 of 2015 on account of death of Shri. Kishore Pramanik under Motor Vehicle Act. During the pendency of the petition Smt. Jharna Pramanik mother of the deceased expired. The petitioner herein filed an application under Order 22 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for impleading the legal heirs of Late Smt. Jamuna Pramanik. The said

application was dismissed by the learned tribunal vide order dated December 6, 2022 primarily on the ground that the legal heirs of late Jharna Pramanik were not dependent upon the income of the deceased. The petitioner aggrieved of this has filed this