IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Debangsu Basak

C.O. 189 of 2025

Santosh Kumar Singh & Anr.

Vs.

Sique Wen

For the Petitioners : Mr. Sibasis Ghosh

Mr. Kunaljit Bhattacharya

Mr. Haider Ali

Mr. Satyam Sarkar

For the Opposite Party : Ms. Bedashruti Bose

Mr. Subham Chanda

Heard & Judgment on : November 21, 2025

Debangsu Basak, J.:-

1. Revisional application is directed against order dated July 15, 2025 passed

by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalpaiguri in Misc. Appeal

Case no. 3 of 2022.

2. By the impugned order, learned Appeal Court was pleased to affirm the

order of status quo passed by the learned Trial Judge on June 17, 2022.

3. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the initial order dated June 17, 2022 passed by the learned Single Judge was in violation of Order 39 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908. He submits that compliance of Order 39 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 is mandatory. In absence of such compliance, the injunction order is liable to be vacated. In support of such contention, he relies upon 2025 INSC 966 (Time City Infrastructure and Housing Lim