SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 7043

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
BULAI S. GANGULY – Appellant
Versus
THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. – Respondent


26.11.2025

sb

Ct.3.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

WPA 25522 of 2025

Bulai S. Ganguly

Versus

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Ms. Ujjaini Chatterjee

Mr. Siddharta Basu

… For the petitioner.

Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee

Mr. Debanjan Mukherjee

Ms. Manisha Nath

… For Kolkata Municipal Corporation

Mr. Bimalendu Das

Ms. Kakali Pal

… For the State.

1. Though the writ petition was filed challenging the notice dated 3rd November, 2025, issued by the respondent no.3, however, upon hearing the parties this Court was pleased to pass the order dated 12th November,

2025 on the following terms:-

“This matter was mentioned in the morning citing

extreme urgency. Accordingly, this matter has been taken up out of turn upon notice to the Municipal

authorities.

Mr. Chowdhury, learned Senior Advocate

representing the petitioner by drawing attention of this Court to the notice dated 3rd November, 2025 would submit that without providing the petitioner with any opportunity of hearing, a decision has been taken to demolish unauthorized/dangerous portion of the building i.e. the dilapidated portion of premises No.

12/1A Hindustan Park, Kolkata - 700029 pursuant to an order dated 24th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top