SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 7093

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
WEST BENGAL HOUSING BOARD – Appellant
Versus
THE CIVCON CONSTRUCTION PVT. LIMITED – Respondent


OCD-1

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION

ORIGINAL SIDE

APO/71/2020

WITH

AP/810/2010

WEST BENGAL HOUSING BOARD

VS

THE CIVCON CONSTRUCTION PVT. LIMITED

BEFORE:

The Hon’ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK

-AND-

The Hon’ble JUSTICE MD. SHABBAR RASHIDI

For the Appellant : Mr. Shounak Mukhopadhyay, Adv.

Ms. Shrayashee Das, Adv.

Mr. Paritosh Sinha, Adv.

Mr. Tridibesh Dasgupta, Adv.

Mr. Rohan Kumar Thakur, Adv.

For the Respondent : Mr. Shiv Shankar Banerjee, Adv.

Ms. Arijita Ghose, Adv.

Mr. Siddhartha Chamaria, Adv.

HEARD ON : 02.12.2025 DELIVERED ON : 02.12.2025

DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-

1. Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,

1996, is directed against the judgment and order dated March 17,

2020 passed in AP/810/2010.

2. By the impugned judgment and order, learned Single Judge refused

to set aside the award dated September 30, 2010.

3. Learned advocate appearing for the appellant, draws the attention of

the Court to the terms and conditions of the contract entered into

between the parties and particularly, the arbitration clause. According to him, there are certain matters which are excepted in terms of the arbitration clause.

4. Learned advocate appearing for the appellant draws

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top