SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 7107

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
KAMALA BHATTACHARJEE AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
SUMAN GANGULY AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

Before:

The Hon’ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

C.O. 3528 of 2025

Kamala Bhattacharjee & Anr.

VS.

Suman Ganguly & Anr.

For the Petitioners : Mr. Haradhan Banerjee,

Mr. Amitaba Pain,

Mr. Partha Pratim Mukhopadhyay,

Mr. Vivek Tripathi,

Mr. Suresh Kr. Sahoo

….Advocates

For the Opposite Parties : Ms. Shohini Chakraborty,

Mr. Koushik Bhattacharya,

Mr. Suranjan Mondal,

Ms. Gargee Acharya Biswas,

Ms. Moushumi Biswas

…. Advocates

Reserved on : 22.09.2025 Judgment on : 02.12.2025

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.:-

1. This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the

instance of the Judgment Debtors and is directed against an order being No. 57, dated August 28, 2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) 1st Court at Barasat in Title Execution Case No. 1 of 2014 arising

out of Title Suit No. 266 of 2011.

2. By the order impugned, the prayer of the decree holders/ opposite parties herein for delivery of khas possession was allowed and the Court bailiff was directed to deliver khas possession of the decretal property to the opposite parties after removing all obstructions within the time limit indicated in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top