Karnataka HC Notices Sri Lankan Judge's Rights Plea
07 Mar 2026
Karnataka Proposes Social Media Ban for Under-16s
07 Mar 2026
Justice Dharmadhikari Sworn In as 55th Madras HC Chief Justice
07 Mar 2026
Punjab HC Acquits Ram Rahim in Journalist Murder
07 Mar 2026
Appellate Courts Can Rely on Unexhibited Public Documents Produced by Plaintiff: Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
THE WEST BENGAL BOARDD PRIMARY EDUCATION AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
PRIYANKA NASKAR AND ORS – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Civil Appellate Jurisdiction
APPELLATE SIDE
Present:
The Hon’ble Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty
&
The Hon’ble Justice Reetobroto Kumar Mitra
MAT/873/2023
IA NO: CAN/9/2023, CAN/10/2023, CAN/11/2023, CAN/12/2023, CAN/13/2023, CAN/14/2024, CAN/15/2024, CAN/16/2024, CAN/17/2024, CAN/18/2024, CAN/19/2024, CAN/20/2024, CAN/21/2024, CAN/22/2024, CAN/23/2024, CAN/24/2024, CAN/25/2024, CAN/26/2024, CAN/27/2024, CAN/28/2024, CAN/29/2024, CAN/30/2024, CAN/31/2024, CAN/32/2024, CAN/33/2024, CAN/34/2025, CAN/35/2025, CAN/36/2025, CAN/37/2025, CAN/38/2025, CAN/39/2025, CAN/40/2025, CAN/41/2025, CAN/42/2025, CAN/43/2025, CAN/44/2025, CAN/45/2025, CAN/46/2025, CAN/47/2025, CAN/48/2025, CAN/49/2025, CAN/50/2025, CAN/51/2025, CAN/52/2025, CAN/53/2025, CAN/54/2025, CAN/55/2
[Judicial review is concerned with the legality of the decision-making process rather than the merits of the decision itself. The court emphasized the importance of timely challenges to administrativ....
The judgment established that when the selection process itself suffers from legal infirmity, there is no need to analyze individual cases on a case-by-case basis.
The cancellation of a specific stage of the recruitment process does not necessarily invalidate the entire process, and candidates who consciously participate in the process cannot later challenge it....
Parity – When there is a declaration of law by court, Judgment can be treated as Judgment in rem and require equities to be balanced by treating those similarly situated, similarly.
Tainted candidates from previous fraudulent selections cannot be allowed in fresh recruitment processes, as it breaches fundamental justice and undermines public trust in educational integrity.
The court ruled that the selection process for Junior Engineers/Assistant Engineers was fraudulent, violating Articles 14 and 16(1) of the Constitution, and directed a fresh review based on actual ma....
Tainted candidates are barred from participating in the recruitment process according to the Supreme Court's directives on fraudulent appointments and adherence to prior recruitment rules.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article