Form No.J(2)

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Civil Appellate Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

Present : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya

&

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Supratim Bhattacharya

FAT No. 83 of 2022

Sri Netai Golder

Vs.

Smt. Sonali Golder

For the appellant : Mr. Satyam Mukherjee,

Ms. Sayani Ahmed,

Mr. Purnendu Shekhar Ghosh,

Mr. Saibal Rakshit, Advs.

Heard on : December 11, 2025. Judgment on : December 11, 2025.

Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya , J .:

1. It appears that by previous orders, administrative notices were

directed to be served afresh on the sole respondent. As per the office report dated August 19, 2025, no service return had yet been received by the department with regard to such

service.

However, learned counsel for the appellant rightly points out

2.

that vide order dated August 29, 2022 passed in connection with CAN 1 of 2022 in respect of the self-same appeal, it was recorded by a coordinate Bench that the report filed by the department showed that administrative notice could not be served upon the respondent as the postal envelope was returned with the endorsement “insufficient address”. It was further recorded that strangely, the earlier notice sent by the appellant to the same