SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 7220

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
KAMAL BANDHOPADHYAY AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent


11.12.2025

Ct. 3

Item No.

AD 05

sayandeep

Kamal Bandhopadhyay & ors.

Versus

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Kushal Chatterjee Mr. Oishik Chatterjee … For the petitioners Mr. Soumyajit Bhatta

…For the respondent Nos. 2 to 6

Md. Sarwar Jahan Ms. Tapati Sarkar

…. For the Intervener

1. The instant writ petition has been moved by the

learned advocate for the petitioner with a innocuous prayer that the pending application for grant of sanction of a building plan pertaining to holding No. 172, Mouza - Panihati JL No. 10 P.S. Kharda, Khatian No. 1713 P.O. Panihati, PIN 700114 and RS plot No. 63 which has been kept pending by the municipality should be directed to be disposed of. In fact, the learned advocate for the petitioner only insisted that this Court, at this stage, considering the fact that the scrutiny of the petitioners’ application for sanction has been completed, the respondents should not be permitted to sit tight on the application and an order should be passed only to the extent of directing that the decision in this

regard should be communicated by the respondents to the petitioners.

2. Ms. Sarkar, learned advocate appears for the intervener Shri Nirmal Singha, and would submit that t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top