CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
KAMAL BANDHOPADHYAY AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
11.12.2025
Ct. 3
Item No.
AD 05
sayandeep
Kamal Bandhopadhyay & ors.
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Kushal Chatterjee Mr. Oishik Chatterjee … For the petitioners Mr. Soumyajit Bhatta
…For the respondent Nos. 2 to 6
Md. Sarwar Jahan Ms. Tapati Sarkar
…. For the Intervener
1. The instant writ petition has been moved by the
learned advocate for the petitioner with a innocuous prayer that the pending application for grant of sanction of a building plan pertaining to holding No. 172, Mouza - Panihati JL No. 10 P.S. Kharda, Khatian No. 1713 P.O. Panihati, PIN 700114 and RS plot No. 63 which has been kept pending by the municipality should be directed to be disposed of. In fact, the learned advocate for the petitioner only insisted that this Court, at this stage, considering the fact that the scrutiny of the petitioners’ application for sanction has been completed, the respondents should not be permitted to sit tight on the application and an order should be passed only to the extent of directing that the decision in this
regard should be communicated by the respondents to the petitioners.
2. Ms. Sarkar, learned advocate appears for the intervener Shri Nirmal Singha, and would submit that t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.