09/01 In the High Court at Calcutta

2026

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

AD-02/24 Appellate Side

266312 NAN DY

(DO) WPA 29926 of 2025

SOURAV GHOSH & ANR.

Vs.

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS.

Mr. Dipanjan Datta, Advocate

Mr. Jay Manna, Advocate

Mr. Aranyak Saha, Advocate

…...for the Petitioners

Mr. Abhishek Banerjee, Advocate

Ms. Parna Roy Choudhury, Advocate

Ms. Trisa Chanda, Advocate

……for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2

1. Affidavit of service, as filed, be kept with the record.

2. The mesh of facts is quite peculiar. The petitioners are

the owner of a Flat no. A/4 at Janani Apartment, situated in the district of Hooghly which they have purchased from the respondent no. 6 for valuable consideration. The petitioners had taken a loan to purchase the said Flat from the State Bank of India, which they have been

paying without any default.

3. The respondent no. 6, on the other hand, for the purpose

of development of the property had taken a loan from the respondent no. 1 and had defaulted in repayment thereof. The respondent no. 1, Punjab National Bank, upon such default, had affixed a possession notice on the said Building and had exercised its lien due to the

default of the respondent no. 6.

4. The respondent no. 3,