CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
SUCHANDRA GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
SUPRIYA PAUL – Respondent
In the High Court At Calcutta
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI
APPELLATE SIDE
Present:
The Hon’ble Justice Debangsu Basak
And
The Hon’ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)
FAT/18/2024
SMT. SUCHANDRA GHOSH
VS
SMT. SUPRIYA PAUL
For the Appellant :Mr. Bijay Bikram Das, Advocate
Mr. Deborshi Dhar, Advocate
Heard & Judgment on: January 8, 2026
Debangsu Basak, J.
1. Appeal is at the behest of a defendant in Title Suit No. 19 of 2021.
2. By the impugned judgment and order, learned trial Judge passed a
preliminary decree in a suit for partition. Learned trial Judge, by the impugned judgment and decree declared that the parties to the suit
are entitled to 50% share in the suit property.
3. Co-ordinate Bench referred the parties to mediation. Learned
mediator submitted a report stating that the mediation failed.
4. Learned advocate appearing for the appellant submits that, the
parties to the suit purchased an immovable property by a registered deed of conveyance. There was an oral agreement between the
parties to the suit that the defendant should be entitled to the entirety of the suit property.
5. Learned advocate appearing for the appellant submits that, due to the fault of the learned ad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.