SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 46

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
DIPALI CHAKRABORTY AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
PURNIMA CHAKRABORTY AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Debangsu Basak

And

The Hon’ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das)

F.A.T. 33 of 2024

Dipali Chakraborty & Ors.

Vs.

Purnima Chakraborty & Ors.

With

CAN 1 of 2024 CAN 2 of 2024

For the Appellants : Mr. Bapi Sarkar

Mr. Roumyadip Saha

For the Respondents : Mr. Bhaskar Roy Mahasaya

Ms. Taniya Bhowmik

Heard & Judgment on : January 8, 2026

Debangsu Basak, J.:-

1. Appeal and the connected applications are taken up for final hearing.

Attempt for mediation was made which did not succeed.

2. Appellants seek to prefer the appeal directed against a preliminary decree passed in a suit for partition. Preliminary decree was passed on May 23, 2011.

3. CAN 1 of 2024 is an application for condonation of delay while CAN 2 of

2024 is an application seeking stay of the proceedings.

4. Learned advocate appearing for the appellants submits that the appellants were seriously inconvenienced due to the death of the defendant no. 1 and thereafter due to the death of one of the son of the defendant no. 1 as also the son-in-law of the deceased defendant no. 1.

5. Learned advocate appearing for the appellants submits that,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top