SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 54

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
ANIL KUMAR AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
NAV DURGA BARTER PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI

CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

Present:

The Hon’ble Justice Debangsu Basak

CO 230 of 2025

Anil Kumar Agarwal

Vs.

Nav Durga Barter Private Limited

For the Petitioner : Mr. Suresh Kumar Mitruka, Advocate

Mr. Aayush Mitruka, Advocate

Mr. Sujit Swami, Advocate

Ms. Shruti Yadav, Advocate

For the opposite party: Mr. Saptansu Basu, Ld. Sr. Advocate

Mr. Rajat Das, Advocate

Ms. Anumita Lahiri, Advocate

Heard & Judgment on: January 8, 2026

DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:-

1. Revisional application is at the behest of the defendant and directed

against Order No.48 dated November 14, 2025 passed in Title Suit No.71

of 2016.

2. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the suit is of

2016. There is a direction by the High Court passed in 2022 requiring the suit to be disposed of within six months. The suit is yet to be disposed of.

3. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, in a suit for specific performance, the plaintiff/opposite party sought to amend the plaint. Three successive applications for amendment were filed. Two of the applications were not pressed. The third application was allowed by the impugned order.

4. Re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top