SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Cal) 481

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
FULMONI BARIK & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SISIR KUMAR MONDAL & ORS. – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Sugato Majumdar, J.

1.The instant Second Appeal was filed against the appellate judgement and decree dated 30/06/2008, passed by the Learned Additional District Judge, 3rd Court, Hoogly in Title Appeal No.74 of 2004, reversing the judgment and decree of the Trial Court dated 12/03/2004.

2. The sum and substance of the plaint case was that the Plaintiffs jointly purchased a plot of land admeasuring 2 cottahs 20 sq. ft. along with structures standing thereon (suit property) on 17/02/1992 by a registered deed of conveyance. Prior to purchase, the Defendant No.1 was in occupation of the same as caretaker. On the date of execution of the deed of conveyance, the proforma Defendant No.2 cancelled the license granted to the Defendant No.1 and asked to handover the possession. On request, a fresh leave and license was granted to the Defendant No.1 by the Plaintiffs. On or about 06/10/1994 the Plaintiffs requested the Defendant No.1 to quit and vacate the suit property but they requested for extension of license for another period of six months to which the Plaintiffs agreed. Again on 21/06/1995, the Plaintiffs requested the Defendant No.1 to vacate the suit property but the Defendan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top