SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Cal) 72

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
... – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. – Respondent
WPA 24402 / 2025



08.01.2026

cm

WPA 24402 of 2025

XXX

Vs.

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Ms. XXX

Petitioner-in-person

Mr. Jayanta Samanta

Ms. Indumouli Banerjee

… for the respondent No. 1 to 3/State

Mr. Amitabha Ghosh

Ms. Sanjana Rawat

… for the respondent No. 4

1. Let the affidavit of service filed on behalf of the

petitioner who appeared in person online be kept on

record.

2. Pursuant to the notice being served upon the

respondents, the respondents No. 1 to 3/State have been represented by learned advocate Mr. Jayanta Samanta. Mr. Amitava Ghosh, learned advocate

appeared to represent the respondent No.4.

3. Despite service of notice, none appeared to represent

instruct the concerned police station to serve notice appropriate representation before the Court

intimating the next date of hearing and file a compliance report to that effect on the next date.

5. The petitioner appearing in person submitted to have been incapacitated to file affidavit-in-reply to the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the learned advocates representing the respondent No. 1 to 3 and respondent No. 4 since her belongings comprising of medical papers, medicines, medical equipments, and certain relevant documents etc. have been in the custody of the respondent No. 4 along with other articles.

6. The learned advocate representing the State respondents submitted despite the police officials seeking the alleged list of articles from the petitioner on several occasions, the petitioner failed to furnish the same.

7. The petitioner appearing-in-person is to the furnish list of articles alleged to be in the custody of respondent No.4 before this Court on the next date of hearing to enable the State authorities to authenticate the veracity of the same.

8. The learned advocate representing the respondent No.

4, however, refuted the contentions of the petitioner appearing in person that her belongings as claimed by her, to have been in the custody of the respondent No.

4.

9. Next date be fixed on 20th January, 2026.

10. Copy of the order be sent to the Department as ( L & OM) for immediate compliance.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top